img:is([sizes=auto i],[sizes^="auto," i]){contain-intrinsic-size:3000px 1500px} /*# sourceURL=wp-img-auto-sizes-contain-inline-css */

天美影视传媒

Skip to content

New Peer Tuition Comparisons Now Available

The Office of Planning & Budgeting has recently published new peer tuition comparisons for the 2016-17 academic year. The allow you to see UW tuition rates alongside those of peer institutions.

In the past, OPB has published tuition comparisons for Global Challenge State (GCS) peer institutions. However, more recently OPB has moved away from GCS peer comparisons toward comparisons based on the US News & World Report ranking of Top Public Schools. The 2017 US News ranking is (the UW is ranked #16 in the nation). The US News peer comparison group includes all public universities ranked #25 or better; because of ties, and because not all top-25 universities are in the R1 category, there may be more or fewer than 25 institutions in this peer comparison group each year. (In order to make comparisons across time, historical averages are calculated based on the 2017 US News peer list, not the US News list current at the time.)

Comparisons include undergraduate, graduate, MBA, PharmD, law, medicine, and dentistry tuition rates for both resident and nonresident students. Most data are provided through the (AAUDE). For peer institutions that are not part of AAUDE, we found tuition data on the universities鈥 websites.

For each tuition category, we provide a list of current tuition rates at each institution, along with a chart comparing UW tuition against the peer group average over the past 5 years. This allows you to look at both the UW鈥檚 current rates as well as recent trends, side by side with peers. For example, the UW鈥檚 resident undergraduate tuition rate is well below the peer average, partially due to tuition decreases in the last two years. Nonresident undergraduate tuition rates, on the other hand, have tracked closely with the peer average (remaining within 5% of the average over the past five years).

You can see more in the peer tuition comparison file, and find other comparisons on OPB鈥檚 Peer Comparisons page. Please contact OPB Institutional Analysis at uwir@uw.edu with any questions.

Introducing Peer Finance Dashboards!

OPB鈥檚 Institutional Analysis team and UW-IT鈥檚 Enterprise Information, Integration & Analytics unit announce seven , available now in UW Profiles. These new dashboards join four existing peer dashboards. Peer dashboards use data publicly available through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) to allow users to compare the UW to peer institutions around the country on a range of student- and finance-focused measures.

With the new finance dashboards, users can compare revenues, expenses, and endowment values at the UW and peer institutions. They can also explore the relative importance of different revenue sources and expense categories across institutions. The expenses story dashboard provides a step-by-step look at the expenses that directly or indirectly support universities鈥 research and instruction missions.

More information about each of the new peer finance dashboards is available through the online documentation. Please feel free to send any questions or comments to uwprofiles@uw.edu.

Updated OPB Brief on Published Price vs. Net Price

The rising costs of college are a popular subject for everyone from presidential candidates to . Parents and students blanche as published tuition prices climb ever higher. But the published price聽鈥 often referred to as the 鈥渟ticker price鈥 for colleges 鈥 offers a misleading picture of the cost of higher education. OPB has updated our brief to reflect the newest available data on published price vs. net price. Highlights include:

  • Sector-wide data on increases in published price and net price for public and private four-year colleges
  • A description of how declining state investment in higher education has spurred tuition increases
  • A table of the top 25 research universities鈥 net price for resident undergraduates receiving grant or scholarship aid

Our updated brief is accessible .

 

UC Plans to Expand Resident Undergraduate Enrollment

A recent story in the LA Times, 鈥溾 outlined the University of California鈥檚 plan to expand resident undergraduate enrollment at their nine undergraduate campuses. Like many U.S. public universities that have faced significant state divestment during the recession, the UC system has enrolled more nonresident students in recent years to help cover funding cuts and keep resident tuition increases to a minimum. To adjust this trend, the California Legislature recently increased its investment in the UC system by $25 million to partially fund the enrollment of 5,000 additional resident undergraduate students by no later than 2016-17.聽 To pay for an additional 5,000 enrollments proposed by UC, system President Janet Napolitano plans to phase out aid for low-income non-resident students and request additional funding from the California Legislature. Napolitano was quoted as assuming the legislature would 鈥渃ontinue to support access for California students.鈥

According to the article, UC officials are now 鈥渨orking through the logistics of housing, laboratory availability, and classroom sizes.鈥 The increase in undergraduate students will also necessitate enrolling 600 more graduate students for instruction and lab support.

The 天美影视传媒 has faced similar financial pressures as a result of the recession, but remains committed to providing Washington students with affordable, quality higher education.

  • The UW continues to fully fund , which covers, at minimum,聽tuition and fees for resident undergraduate students who qualify for the Pell Grant or State Need Grant.
  • Since 2009-10, the UW has increased incoming enrollment of resident undergraduates by聽more than聽1000 students at its three campuses.
  • During the recession, the UW increased its contribution to institutional financial aid in order to maintain access for students with the most financial need.
  • The percentage of Pell-eligible students at the UW rose from less than 20 percent in 2007-08 to 29 percent in 2014-15.

With undergraduate students in the UC system, the plan would increase their undergraduate enrollment by over 5 percent. To achieve a similar overall increase, the UW would need to add approximately 2000 students and would face significant barriers in doing so. Unlike the UC system, UW does not provide need-based aid for non-resident undergraduate students, and thus would not be able to cut that non-resident aid funding to pay for additional resident enrollment. Additionally, all three campuses are nearly at capacity without significant capital investment.

UW is Most Innovative Public University in the World and 鈥淏est Bang for the Buck鈥 Among Western Schools

recently ranked the UW as the fourth most innovative university in the world among public and private institutions, surpassed only by Stanford, MIT and Harvard.聽 When looking at public institutions alone, however, the UW topped the list.

As the noted, 鈥淭he ranking takes into account academic papers, which indicate basic research performed at a university, and patent filings and successes, which point to an institution鈥檚 interest in protecting and commercializing its discoveries.鈥

In addition to the innovation ranking, recently ranked UW Seattle as the #1 鈥淏est Bang for the Buck鈥 among Western institutions.聽 Institutions are scored on 鈥溾橬et鈥 (not sticker) price, how well they do graduating the students they admit, and whether those students go on to earn at least enough to pay off their loans.鈥澛 For more information about the 鈥淏est Bang for the Buck鈥 rankings, please see the .

UW Ranked 14th Best University in the World by U.S. News & World Report

The 天美影视传媒 was ranked the 14th best university in the world by U.S. News & World Report鈥檚 inaugural “,” which was released on Tuesday.

Unlike U.S. News鈥檚 national rankings, which focus on undergraduate admissions data and graduation rates, these new rankings were based on research-heavy factors such global research reputation, number of publications, PhDs awarded, and highly cited papers ().聽 This methodological difference helps explains the odd fact that U.S. News ranks the UW 14th globally, but 48th nationally.

“This is about faculty productivity and prestige … It is meaningful for certain things and not necessarily meaningful for other things. We get that. This is about big muscular research universities doing what research universities claim is their mission,” U.S. News Editor, Brian Kelly, told .

The 2015 Best Global Universities rankings include 500 institutions and 49 countries, and provide breakdowns by region, country, and 21 subject areas. The U.S. dominated the rankings with 16 institutions in the top 20, and 134 institutions on the list overall. 聽Germany had the second most institutions on the list, with 42, followed by the United Kingdom, with 38. China, which has received a lot of attention in the higher education world lately, also did well with 27 schools among the top 500.

The UW ranks highly on several other global lists:聽 15th worldwide by the and 26th by the Times Higher Education .

Rankings Abound

The Equity Line, among others, how the recent of colleges by enrollment of Pell Grant recipients is a nice gesture, but lacking in many ways. The 天美影视传媒 (and most public institutions!) was not evaluated as part of the effort, though one-quarter of its undergraduate population received Pell Grant funding last year.

Equity Line contributor Jose Luis Santos notes that, “…the rankings only capture a tiny number of undergraduates enrolled in four-year colleges who receive Pell Grants (just 1.6 percent!), leaving out more than 4.2 million students. This , and it distracts the public and policymakers from the real problems with higher education access and success.”

US News & World Report released its much anticipated set of annual rankings this week; the UW fared better this year. Additional analysis about the UW’s position in US News will be posted to the blog as it becomes available.

Stanford Announces It Will Divest from Coal Companies

On Tuesday, Stanford鈥檚 Board of Trustees it 鈥渨ill not directly invest in approximately 100 publicly traded companies for which coal extraction is the primary business, and will divest of any current direct holdings in such companies.鈥 Furthermore, Stanford stated it would encourage its external investment managers to avoid investments in such companies.

The decision was made at the recommendation of the university’s Advisory Panel on Investment Responsibility and Licensing (APIRL), which had spent several months analyzing a petition by a student group called Fossil Free Stanford. After conducting an extensive research-based review of the issues, APRIL concluded that sufficient coal alternatives exist and that divestment 鈥減rovides leadership on a critical matter facing our world and is an appropriate application of the university’s investment responsibility policy.鈥

This issue has arisen several times at the UW, which (like Stanford) is a leader in . Stanford鈥檚 decision may set a precedent for other universities, including the UW, that have grappled with this issue.

UW Ranks 1st among Public Schools and 2nd Overall for Federal R&D Funding

Of the nearly 900 schools that received federal money for research and development (R&D) in FY 2011, the UW ranks first among public institutions and second overall in terms of federal research funding. According to a study by the National Science Foundation (NSF), approximately 20 percent of all federal R&D support went to just 10 universities. reviewed those universities, Table 1 summarizes their findings.

Johns Hopkins University, a private institution, topped the list with nearly $1.9 billion鈥攎ore than doubling what any other university received that year. The majority of Johns Hopkins鈥 federal funding came from the Dept. of Defense and NASA. The university also聽brought in billions via fundraising efforts.

The UW came in second with almost $950 million in federal R&D funding鈥攖he most of any public school. The majority of the UW鈥檚 money came from the Dept. of Health and Human Services; however, the University was the top beneficiary of NSF funding, receiving more than $145 million in 2011.

Year after year, the same schools consistently receive the most money, said Ronda Britt, a survey statistician with the NSF. 24/7 Wall St. quotes her as saying, these universities 鈥渉ave big research programs that receive a lot of support year after year, and have a lot of infrastructure that helps them keep the money stable.鈥 This holds true for the UW, which has ranked first among public schools since 1974. Having large endowments was another commonality of the top 10 schools, yet federal funding covered the bulk of R&D expenditures in all cases.

As these universities rely heavily on the federal government to support their research, many are concerned about the sweeping cuts of sequestration. The UW and other universities are preparing for a range of possible impacts. As described in our , the sequester could reduce the UW鈥檚 federal grant and contract support by an estimated $75M to $100M during FY13. The UW community is encouraged to remain cautious and conservative in spending federal awards and in planning for future federal funding.

Washington Schools Leads Nation in Peace Corps Volunteers

As reported today, 鈥淔or the first time ever, three Washington colleges swept the nation in their respective size categories for having the most participants in the Peace Corps.鈥 The UW topped the large-schools list with 107 volunteers (tied with the University of Florida), Western Washington University led the medium-schools list with 73 volunteers, and Gonzaga University came in first on the small-schools list with 24.

Carrie Hessler-Radelet, acting director of the Peace Corps, traveled from D.C. to attend a news conference here on campus today. She personally congratulated the three schools on their rankings and said the achievement reflects Washington鈥檚 dedication to innovation and helping the poor.

The UW also topped the large-schools list between 2007 and 2010.