Brian Harvey – UW News /news Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:23:59 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Two UW faculty named fellows of Ecological Society of America /news/2022/04/13/two-uw-faculty-named-fellows-of-ecological-society-of-america/ Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:28:27 +0000 /news/?p=78122 Two 天美影视传媒 professors have been honored by the Ecological Society of America for their knowledge and contributions to the field of ecology.

, a professor in the UW School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, has been named a 2022 fellow of the Ecological Society of America. Fellows are elected for life, and the honor recognizes scientists who advance or apply ecological knowledge in academics, government, nonprofits and the broader society.

photo of Julian Olden
Julian Olden

Olden studies the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems in response to environmental change. Olden seeks to integrate science-based approaches with on-the-ground management decisions, and he actively engages in science communication and community science efforts.

, an assistant professor in the UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, has been named a 2022 early career fellow, an honor for researchers who are within eight years of completing their doctoral training.

photo of brian harvey
Brian Harvey

Harvey鈥檚 research focuses on understanding forest disturbances 鈥 fires and insect outbreaks 鈥 and how forests are shaped by these disturbances, along with climate. For the last decade, Harvey has conducted research on the disturbance ecology of forests in the Pacific Northwest, the Rockies and coastal California.

“I’m delighted to see these two exceptional faculty recognized by the ESA,” said Maya Tolstoy, Maggie Walker Dean of the UW College of the Environment. “Julian and Brian each bring innovative approaches to research, teaching and community engagement that are outstanding within their fields, and further the essential work of understanding human impacts on our planet’s ecological processes.”

According to the Ecological Society of America鈥檚 April 12 , Olden was elected for “pushing the frontiers of invasion ecology and deepening the understanding of freshwater sustainability through environmental flows management, for tireless science communication and for his dedication to training the next generation of freshwater ecologists and conservation biologists.”

Harvey was elected for “deepening understanding of the effects of natural disturbances, especially fire and insect outbreaks, on resilience and management of forests in the U.S. West; for excellence in science communication and outreach; and for outstanding teaching and mentoring at all levels from undergraduate to advanced graduate.”

]]>
Expert FAQ: Wildfires in the Pacific Northwest during the COVID-19 pandemic /news/2020/07/29/expert-faq-wildfires-in-the-pacific-northwest-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/ Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:16:58 +0000 /news/?p=69658
Taylor Creek and Klondike Fires, Rogue-Siskiyou National Forest, Oregon, 2018 Photo: Kari Greer / U.S. Forest Service- Pacific Northwest Region

 

Forest fires are one of nature鈥檚 oldest land management tools. For more than 10,000 years, Indigenous people in the Pacific Northwest have harnessed the power of fire to control the threat of destructive wildfires and encourage new growth across landscapes. In recent centuries, as the number of people living in forested areas has increased and large amounts of fuel have built up over years of suppression, large seasonal wildfires are becoming more common. The impacts of these fires have been felt far and wide 鈥 and not just by those directly affected by the flames.

See our full list of UW wildfire experts and recent wildfire research

Smoke and pollution caused by large wildfires can have severe and irreversible impacts on the health and well-being of nearby communities, as well as for people who live farther away. Mounting research shows that wildfire smoke can adversely affect populations living many miles away from the actual location of the fires. As the Northern Hemisphere moves into summer in the grips of the COVID-19 pandemic, the confluence of risks that fires present to our landscape and our public health have been brought into stark focus.

The 天美影视传媒 has a long history of leading research into the impacts of wildfires from an ecological and health perspective. We worked with two experts to answer some of the most frequently asked questions about wildfires in the Pacific Northwest, including the ways that the pandemic is increasing our community鈥檚 vulnerability to extreme wildfire events in the region.


man smiling at camera
Brian Harvey

Answers in “Environmental impacts of wildfires” section are provided by , assistant professor, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences.听Harvey鈥檚 research focuses on understanding forest disturbances 鈥 like fires and insect outbreaks 鈥 and how forest structure and function are shaped by disturbances, interactions among disturbances and climate.


portrait of woman
Tania Busch Isaksen

Answers in “Wildfire smoke and your health” and the “Wildfire smoke during the COVID-19 pandemic” sections are provided by , senior lecturer, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and clinical associate professor, Department of Health Services. Busch Isaksen’s research is focused on public health outcomes associated with extreme heat and wildfire smoke exposures, risk communication methods and climate change-related public health adaptation planning and response, among other topics.


Environmental impacts of wildfires

Fire is integral to our forests in the Pacific Northwest鈥攚ithout it, they would look profoundly different than the forests that we know and love today. Wildfires do a lot 鈥渨ork鈥 in our Pacific Northwest forests; removing fuel (by burning it away), recycling nutrients, creating critical opportunities for new trees to establish, and stimulating herbaceous growth that supports high wildlife diversity are all just a few of the critical ecosystem services that wildfires provide.

However, in some contexts of our modern world (e.g., when human safety and infrastructure is at risk), letting wildfires burn unabated is simply too dangerous. Prescribed fires are an effective tool in such situations, and are a relatively cost-effective way to reduce hazardous fuel buildup so that wildfires can do more of the work they performed historically in a way that is less threatening to society. With prescribed fires, we have a lot more choice as to where and when fire is applied as a management tool, and when and where smoke will be produced. Wildfires will always remain a key part of our forests, and prescribed fires do not make as much sense in forests where the natural fire regime is characterized by infrequent and severe fires. However, in dry, frequent-fire forests, prescribed fire is a key piece of the fire and forest management puzzle, especially in sensitive areas.

Recent decades have seen a marked increase in area burned in the western U.S. that has tracked warming temperatures over the same time period, and the Pacific Northwest is no exception. The year 2015 saw the greatest total area burned in recent history for Washington state, and many will remember several fires in eastern Washington burning more than 100,000 acres.

Recent years have also seen some fires larger than 10,000 acres on the west side of the Cascades, which historically included fire events on the order of several hundreds of thousands of acres. While the proportion of area that burns at high severity (e.g., killing most vegetation) hovers around 25% to 35% for most fires, more area burned means more area burned severely. A in 2016 showed that nearly half of the increase in area burned across the western U.S. since the mid-1980s can be attributed to human-caused climate change. Coupling further climate warming with fuel amounts sufficient to carry fire, we should expect an increase in the potential for fire across the Northwest in the years ahead.

Fires are a key part of the ecology of our forests in the Pacific Northwest, and the role fire plays in shaping our forests varies across space. For example, a given patch of dry ponderosa pine forest on the east side of the Cascades historically experiences fire every few years to every few decades. These frequent fires remove fuels from the forest, keeping fire intensity and severity relatively low, and the thick bark on trees such as ponderosa pine allows these trees to survive many fires over their multi-century lifetime. Conversely, a typical patch of cold subalpine forests or moist Douglas-fir and western hemlock forests like what we see on the crest or west side of the Cascades historically experienced fire every few centuries or longer.

These infrequent fires historically burned through naturally high fuel amounts, resulting in large, severe fires (i.e., they killed nearly 100% of above-ground plants). This sounds scary from our human perspective, but the ecological opportunities created by these severe fires lead to extraordinarily high biodiversity for plants and animals in the decades that follow 鈥 including the key natural establishment opportunity for trees like Douglas fir and lodgepole pine.

Wildfires always have been, and always will be a key part of our forests in the Northwest. That said, minimizing the number of unplanned human-caused fires is important for safely and effectively managing forests and fires. It is important to minimize sources of ignition as much as possible during the warm and dry conditions that define our fire season in the Northwest (generally mid-spring to mid-fall), and especially so when winds are high. Potential sources of ignition include: driving vehicles or operating machinery in areas with dry grass fuels; campfires and barbeques; fireworks; burning yard waste; or anything that could produce a spark or ignite highly flammable vegetation when it is warm and dry. Add high winds and that spark can escape quickly.

Adhering to local restrictions on burning is key to preventing wildfires. Around homes and structures, we can mitigate the potential for ignition by removing fuels and . Several programs such as and the provide useful resources that a wide range of sectors can draw upon to keep our communities safe from wildfires. We will never be able to completely prevent wildfires from occurring (and given their importance for our forest ecosystems, we may not want to), but by being careful and proactive about reducing fuels and minimizing ignitions, we can reduce the aspects of wildfires that are most dangerous to our communities.

Reversing the old adage, it鈥檚 safe to say, 鈥渨here there鈥檚 fire, there鈥檚 smoke.鈥 That is, given that fires are an integral part of how our forests function in the Northwest, there has always been, and always will be some level of smoke that impacts our region. But just as fire knows no boundaries and can travel from one parcel of land to another, smoke is even more mobile. For example, much of the smoke in the sky in the Pacific Northwest over the past few summers has traveled from areas as far away as northern British Columbia and California. Conversely, the smoke produced from fires in Washington can impact us directly, but can also travel far away. Because much of western North America is composed of fire-prone ecosystems, smoke is likely an inevitable consequence of living here. However, we can do a lot more to adapt in our communities to the reality of smoke, and be prepared to protect ourselves when the smoke returns.

Wildfire smoke and your health

No, all wildfire smoke is not the same. The particles and chemical constituents within smoke vary depending on the fuel burned, moisture content of the fuel and surrounding meteorological conditions. In general, ultra-fine particulate matter is the primary public-health related hazard associated with short-term and cumulative exposure to wildfire smoke. However, other hazardous air pollutants that affect health can be present in wildfire smoke.

Our understanding of the health effects attributed to wildfire smoke exposure has grown over the past several years, with widespread smoke events becoming more frequent in densely populated areas. Fine and ultra-fine particulate matter found in wildfire smoke is a respiratory irritant that can exacerbate pre-existing conditions like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Short-term exposure to wildfire smoke (e.g. days to weeks) has been associated with an increase in respiratory-related hospitalizations in studies across the . Specific to Washington State, a led by Colorado State University looked at wildfire smoke exposure during the summer of 2012 and found an increase in asthma, COPD and all-respiratory hospitalizations during wildfire smoke events. Short-term exposure to wildfire smoke has also been linked to an increase in mortality. In Washington State, a 天美影视传媒 observed an increase in non-traumatic, respiratory and COPD-related mortality on wildfire smoke days compared to non-smoke days.

As with many environmental exposures, those most at risk of poor health outcomes include the elderly, young, immunocompromised, and those with underlying health conditions such as asthma, COPD and cerebrovascular disease. Specific to wildfire smoke, those who work outdoors or who are experiencing homelessness are also at greater risk because of the increased likelihood of exposure.

Good quality, frequently updated information is important when making personal decisions about how to reduce your exposure during a wildfire smoke event. Nationally, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains the that draws from air pollution data from multiple agencies to produce an Air Quality Index (AQI). The EPA has also created a citizen science project using a mobile app named . This app provides updated AQI and active wildfire information based on your location and also encourages you to track and share your own wildfire smoke symptoms via the app 鈥 in the name of science.

In Washington State, the Departments of Ecology and Health, in collaboration with local and tribal health authorities, maintain and update the . The blog helps you prepare for fire season, provides information on how to become smoke ready, displays current and forecasted air quality information, and suggests useful tips for reducing your exposure to wildfire smoke.

We also recommend you consult your local county and/or tribal health departments and , as many of these local resources have specific local interventions available during wildfire smoke events.

There are a number of actions you and your family can do to reduce your risk of health effects associated with wildfire smoke exposure. As with an emergency or disaster, preparation is key!

  1. Identify and access forecast and real-time air quality information sources (see above suggestions).
  2. Create a in your home using a High Efficiency Particulate Air (.
  3. If you have an air conditioner at home or in your car, acquaint yourself with the 鈥榬ecirculate鈥 setting. This reduces the intake of smoke-contaminated air into your home or vehicle.
  4. Check your vehicle(s) air filter and make sure it is HEPA or an equivalent.
  5. Create a plan for your family activities (devise alternative indoor activities in case of wildfire smoke.)
  6. Use the correct personal protective equipment. N95 masks are the minimum respiratory protection effective at filtering particulate matter from wildfire smoke. Cloth masks and bandanas do NOT provide protection from wildfire smoke. Unfortunately, the supply of N95s have been affected during the pandemic and should be reserved for health care providers. At this time, we recommend limiting your time outdoors so that respiratory protection is not needed.
  7. Be proactive about medications and managing symptoms, especially if you or someone in your family has existing respiratory and/or circulatory disease. Talk to your health care provider about your concerns.
  8. Consult the Washington State Department of Health website or your local county or tribal health department for additional information.

Wildfire smoke during the COVID-19 pandemic

For individuals with COVID-19, exposure to wildfire smoke may worsen symptoms of COVID-19 or make it difficult for the body鈥檚 immune system to fight the SARS-CoV-2 virus. For those who are COVID-19 free, exposure to wildfire smoke can irritate the lungs and affect immune function, thereby increasing susceptibility to developing COVID-19 if exposed to the virus.

In pre-pandemic times, community 鈥渃lean air shelters鈥 were identified and used in areas impacted by wildfire smoke. These centers provided a respite to those seeking cleaner air. However, this community-level intervention is not realistic during a pandemic where social distancing is a priority. Therefore, the best way to reduce your own risk from wildfire smoke is to focus on what you can do to improve your own . The other major way COVID-19 has significantly impacted our normal response to wildfire smoke exposure has been to the general availability of N95 masks. Long seen as the minimum respiratory protection needed to protect from particulate matter, N95 masks are largely reserved for health care workers, as they also filter out the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Unlike with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, however, cloth masks do little to filter particulate matter from wildfire smoke.

Recent UW wildfire research

A 天美影视传媒 study, published January 2020, takes a big-picture look at what climate change could mean for wildfires in the Northwest. Read more

People of all ages face a slightly increased risk of dying during and just after exposure to wildfire smoke, and middle-aged adults with underlying respiratory conditions face even greater risk, according to a new study led by the 天美影视传媒 Department of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences.

In the first major study following the devastating Carlton Complex fire, researchers from the 天美影视传媒 and U.S. Forest Service found that previous tree thinning and prescribed burns helped forests survive the fire. Read more

Agencies that are well practiced in putting out wildfires are now learning a new skill: how to set the spark and fan the flames. That鈥檚 the case for the state Department of Natural Resources, which is starting to use prescribed burning as part of its strategy for fighting wildfires. Read more

 

Additional resources:

  • & , Washington State Department of Health
  • , Environmental Protection Agency
  • , Home of the U.S. Air Quality Index

]]>
Study synthesizes what climate change means for Northwest wildfires /news/2020/04/01/study-synthesizes-what-climate-change-means-for-northwest-wildfires/ Wed, 01 Apr 2020 22:18:45 +0000 /news/?p=67226
This satellite image captured Aug. 25, 2015, shows fires burning across the Pacific Northwest. Actively burning areas are outlined in red. Photo: Jeff Schmaltz, MODIS Rapid Response Team/NASA

Recent years have brought unusually large and damaging wildfires to the Pacific Northwest 鈥 from the in 2014 that was the largest in Washington’s history, to the in Oregon, to the 2018 Maple Fire, when normally sodden rainforests on the Olympic Peninsula were ablaze. Many people have wondered what this means for our region’s future.

A 天美影视传媒 , published this winter in Fire Ecology, takes a big-picture look at what climate change could mean for wildfires in the Northwest, considering Washington, Oregon, Idaho and western Montana.

Read the . The summary and conclusion are available in both English and Spanish.

Explore the related from the Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center

“We can’t predict the exact location of wildfires, because we don’t know where ignitions will occur. But based on historical and contemporary fire records, we know some forests are much more likely to burn frequently, and models can help us determine where climate change will likely increase the frequency of fire,” said lead author , a research scientist at the UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences and with the U.S. Forest Service.

The review was done in response to a survey of stakeholder needs by the , a UW-hosted federal鈥搖niversity partnership. State, federal and tribal resource managers wanted more information on the available science about fire and climate change.

“We鈥檙e on the cusp of some big changes. We expect that droughts will become more common, and the interaction of climate and fire could look very different by the mid-21st century,” said , professor at the UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences. “Starting the process of adapting to those changes now will give us a better chance of protecting forest resources in the future.”

bare trunks
This land in southwest Washington’s Gifford Pinchot National Forest has burned three times since 2008: the Cold Springs fire in 2008, the Cascade Creek fire in 2012 and the Cougar Creek fire in 2015. Photo: Darryl Lloyd

The greatest increased risk was found for low-elevation ponderosa pine forests, of the type found at lower elevations on the east side of the Cascade Range in Washington, Oregon, Montana and Idaho. This ecosystem has the highest fire risk today and also has the highest increase in risk due to climate change. The authors predict with high confidence that wildfires in this region will become larger and more frequent.

Large wildfires like the 2014 Carlton Complex fire in north central Washington shown here, which burned some 250,000 acres, have occurred across western North America in recent decades. These will likely become more common in a warmer climate, especially in forests with dense trees and undergrowth. Photo: Morris Johnson/U.S. Forest Service

“We can鈥檛 attribute single fire events to climate change. But the trends in large fire events that have been occurring in the region are consistent with expected trends in a warming climate,” said co-author , assistant professor at the UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences. His UW studies forests and fires in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies.

The authors also summarize how other Northwest ecosystems might experience the combined threats of drought, warmer temperatures and insect outbreaks. Moist, coniferous forests 鈥 found on the Olympic Peninsula, in Western Washington and in Northern Idaho 鈥 will likely burn more often, but fires won’t be significantly larger than they were historically. Fires in subalpine, high-elevation forests, found in mountainous terrain, will similarly become more frequent but only slightly larger or more severe.

After describing the threats, the authors evaluate potential strategies to prepare. Land managers could remove dry organic material, or fuels, and maintain forest densities at lower levels to reduce the severity of fires, since the severity of wildfire is more controllable than the frequency or total area burned. Thinning would also help the remaining trees to withstand drought. Planting genetically diverse seedlings could also help with regeneration after fires 鈥 an important step for long-term survival of forests.

Rural landowners can also play a role, the authors write.

“Individual landowners can reduce hazardous fuels, promote species that can survive fire and drought, and increase diversity of species and structures across the landscape,” Peterson said.

Historically the Northwest has had lower risk of wildfire than other states, such as California, but that may be changing.

“In general, the climate in the Northwest is cooler and wetter than in most low-elevation areas of California,” Halofsky said. But the Northwest summers are dry and warm. “Climate change will accentuate dry summers, and Northwest climate will become more similar to current-day California climate, leading to more and bigger fires.”

The study was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior through its UW-hosted Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. Additional funding came from the U.S. Forest Service through its and .

 

For more information, contact Halofsky at jhalo@uw.edu, Harvey at bjharvey@uw.edu or Peterson at wild@uw.edu.

]]>
Video: Wildfires west of the Cascades: Rare, but large and severe /news/2019/08/23/wildfires-are-possible-on-the-west-side-of-the-cascades/ Fri, 23 Aug 2019 22:50:26 +0000 /news/?p=63674

Most of us think of听wildfire in Washington听state听as something that happens east of the mountains.听There鈥檚听a reason for that: more than听99听percent听of听wildfires in the last 40 years have听been east of the Cascade Crest.

But听forest fires听are a natural,听though听rare,听occurrence听on the west side of the mountains as well. These听verdant听forests听don鈥檛听immediately听seem like burnable material. But, with the right conditions, these听areas听can also experience听wildfires.听Years without fire allow听trees and understory听brush听to grow and accumulate significant听biomass, which听can produce听large, severe听wildfires.

, assistant professor in the UW School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, is studying fires in Washington that burn on the west side of the Cascade Crest.听He and his research team are听building on听evidence听that听suggests听Western Washington听has a history of large wildfires, each burning hundreds of thousands of acres.听We听might not be familiar with them,听because听most happened centuries ago.

See a list of 天美影视传媒听fire experts.

“Being able to understand these systems is really critical to our ability to manage them as a society, and make really smart decisions about how we’re going to manage forests,” said Harvey. “That’s particularly important as the human footprint continues to expand.”

Gathering data听on west side fires may听help determine risks听for people who have built homes and communities near wooded areas. It might help in planning how to protect watersheds, and in thinking about forest products and recreation that are part of our economy and culture.

The most recent west side fire was the听听in 2017听near the Crystal Mountain ski resort, and it is the focus of Harvey鈥檚 current work. Although the听fire started on the east side, it traveled over the crest of the mountains and burned听25,000 acres听just outside Mount Rainier National Park. Harvey and collaborators have found听that听the听same听area听experienced听a large fire听in 1890,听as well as in听1700 and听1490.

More recently, the Yacolt Burn in 1902 ravaged an estimated听500,000 acres in southwest Washington. “For scale,” said Harvey, “that鈥檚听about 10 times the area of Seattle.”

How can researchers begin to听understand听where fires burned听more than听500 years ago? One clue is by measuring the age of the trees.听When a stand of trees听is killed听in a fire, a听new听generation听of seedlings听begins听to develop.听As the trees grow, the听similar听ages听within the stand听help indicate how long听it鈥檚听been since a major forest听fire, Harvey explained.

Warm, dry weather,听an ignition source and warm,听dry winds from the east are the main factors听that produce听west side fires.听Although these fires are infrequent, climate change may cause them to be more prevalent in years to come.

Post-fire,听Harvey听and collaborators are finding that听the Norse Peak area has听more biodiversity than it did before. New plants and animals听are听taking advantage of听more听light and space听created during the wildfire.听Harvey听sees his own opportunity,听too, to study听forest ecology and landscape resilience听after a rare fire that happened during his lifetime.

 

More resources:

Read more about Harvey’s听west side fire search听in听.
Harvey and colleagues听听on the 2019 fire season.

]]>